Position one: Send more U.S. and NATO troops to Afghanistan for a counterinsurgency strategy.
Position one written by Trudy Rubin representing the views of David Kilcullen, an Australian counterinsurgency expert.
3 Views:
Bring more NATO troops into Afghanistan and refocus US attention there.
Reestablish control in the cities to build Police and Army to take over
Destroy the support base in Pakistan for Al-Qaeda
Reestablish control in the cities
Allowing for buildup of Afghan army and police
Destroy the ability of the Taliban to maintain control by destroying their support base in the cities
Address Pakistan on how to deal with the Taliban and Al-Qaeda support base in the Tribal Region of Pakistan
Support Pakistan with intelligence and hardware to secure the border region
Use Special Forces and Drone strikes to root out training and launch-bases
Position Two: The main focus of author Michael A. Cohen and Parag Khanna is to shift the major focus of the War effort in Afghanistan to Pakistan. They believe that the main fight and center for Extremism is located in the Tribal areas of Pakistan.
3 Views:
Shift War to Pakistan
The Taliban lack the support from the people of Afghanistan that is necessary to retake the country.
Al-Qaeda will ever be able to rebuild to the same strength they had before the invasion of 2002.
Should not focus on nation building in Afghanistan, but rather support Pakistan.
The Pakistani army and border guards need more support to maintain control of their country where the Taliban and Al-Qaeda have a stronger support base and are truly located.
The US should help fund Pakistan and its social programs.
The best strategy for Afghanistan is for the US military to ally with local warlords and Taliban leaders and use them as a front.
Pay or encourage the Taliban commanders to “flip” and join the Afghan people.
Once they have flipped, pay them to hand over Al-Qaeda operatives.
Position 3: Position three maintains the stance that it would be better to focus on regional negotiations then military solutions. This position is supported by “Mirage of the Good War”, written by Tariq Ali that focuses on a diplomatic path rather than a military one.
3 Views:
Both the Brits and Russians learned the hard way that the people of Afghanistan don’t like to be conquered.
The United States should understand this and follow a more diplomatic course of action.
Our military actions only lead to local anger.
Taliban are gaining popularity
Local Government officials are corrupt
US military causes Collateral damage
We must think politically
Get international support (Russia, Iran, Pakistan, India, and possible China) for a National Afghan Government that represents all groups of ethnicities.
“…in which all citizens can breathe, think, and eat.”
Believe that the people of Afghanistan would support a deal such as this
Position 4: Withdraw all NATO and US troops from Afghanistan and disregard it completely. This position is a analysis of an article written in the Washington Post by George Will.
3 Views:
The corrupt government of Afghanistan lacks the support necessary to rebuild the nation.
Some of the top officials are involved with the opium trade.
The United States does not have enough troops and there is a lack of international support
The United States cannot hold gains it has made because of the lack of troops on the ground.
The International community is reluctant to help out and send troops or even support the war effort.
We cannot rebuild the country, it is too far gone.